IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nzecpp/v52y2018i2p204-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economists and New Zealand population: problems and policies 1900–1980s

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey T. F. Brooke
  • Anthony M. Endres
  • Alan J. Rogers

Abstract

We examine contrasting modalities of economic thought by economists on population problems and policies in NZ, 1900–1980s. Since the early 1900s, NZ economists have been concerned with interactions between economic and demographic outcomes. During the inter-war period, Malthusian concerns became muted because NZ's population growth rate slowed appreciably in the 1930s. A ‘laissez-faire’ position was articulated among some economists in terms of external migration flows; others debated the implications of a stationary population. The post-WWII era ushered in a doctrine of ‘stable population Keynesianism’ based on optimistic neo-Malthusianism that perspective clashed with contemporary views on population expansion and the promotion of immigration coextensive with the policy of planned industrialization. An intellectual void became apparent in the early 1980s, perhaps because concern with the dynamics of population change in a small, liberalized, open economy seemed misplaced. Lessons are drawn from this intellectual history that may inform modern debate on population policy, broadly conceived.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey T. F. Brooke & Anthony M. Endres & Alan J. Rogers, 2018. "The economists and New Zealand population: problems and policies 1900–1980s," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 204-226, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:52:y:2018:i:2:p:204-226
    DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1305983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00779954.2017.1305983
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00779954.2017.1305983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:52:y:2018:i:2:p:204-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RNZP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.