IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nmcmxx/v7y2001i1p1-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling for Fault Detection and Isolation versus Modelling for Control

Author

Listed:
  • P. M. FRANK
  • E. ALCORTA GARCIA
  • B. KÖPPEN-SELIGER

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to emphasize the particularities of models needed for model-based fault detection and isolation (FDI) in contrast to the models used for control. Of special interest is the question of complexity of the model, which is of great importance for the practical implementation. This, of course, depends basically on the given situation such as the kind of plant, the measurements, the kind and number of faults to be detected and the demands for fault isolation and robustness. However, the paper shows that diagnostic models, in contrast to the wide-spread opinion that those have always to be more complex than the functional models for control, may be even less complex, because they are restricted to only those parts of the system in which the faults occur. The issue of model complexity is discussed in terms of different model-based FDI approaches analytical, knowledge-based and data-based. The ideas are illustrated in a case study, where several types of model-based FDI techniques are compared with the same plant, the amira three tank system.

Suggested Citation

  • P. M. Frank & E. Alcorta Garcia & B. Köppen-Seliger, 2001. "Modelling for Fault Detection and Isolation versus Modelling for Control," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-46, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:7:y:2001:i:1:p:1-46
    DOI: 10.1076/mcmd.7.1.1.3633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1076/mcmd.7.1.1.3633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1076/mcmd.7.1.1.3633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:7:y:2001:i:1:p:1-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/NMCM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.