IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nmcmxx/v17y2010i1p19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A continuum-mechanics interpretation of Reissner's non-linear shear-deformable beam theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Irschik
  • Johannes Gerstmayr

Abstract

This article deals with the non-linear modelling of beams that are bent, sheared and stretched by external forces and moments. In the following, we restrict to plane-deformations and static conditions. Our task is to present a continuum mechanics-based interpretation of the celebrated large displacement finite deformation structural mechanics theory, which was presented by Eric Reissner [ On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem , J. Appl. Math. Phys. 23 (1972), pp. 795--804]. The latter formulation was restricted to the notions of structural mechanics and thus did not use the notions of stress and strain, which are fundamental for continuum mechanics. Thus, the common continuum mechanics-based constitutive modelling at the stress--strain level cannot be utilized in connection with Reissner's original theory. Instead, Reissner suggested that constitutive relations between certain generalized strains (bending, shear and axial force strains) and generalized static entities (bending moments, shear and normal forces) should be evaluated from physical experiments. This means that the beam to be studied must be first built up, and the experiments must be performed for the real beam as a whole. Although such physical experiments are indeed to be performed in practice for safety reasons in sensible cases, for example, bridge decks or aircraft wings, it is nevertheless felt to be a drawback that the results of simple standardized stress--strain experiments concerning the constitutive behaviour of the materials, from which the beam is built up, cannot be used. Moreover, relying only on physical experiments on the whole beam means that computations (virtual experiments) can be made only after the beam has been built up. To overcome this problem, we subsequently present a continuum mechanics-based interpretation of Reissner's structural mechanics modelling, by attaching a proper continuum mechanics-based meaning to both the generalized static entities and the generalized strains in Reissner's theory [E. Reissner, On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem , J. Appl. Math. Phys. 23 (1972), pp. 795--804]. Consequently, these generalized static entities can be related to the generalized strains on the basis of a constitutive modelling on the stress--strain level. We show this in some detail in this contribution for a hyperelastic material proposed by Simo and Hughes [ Computational Inelasticity , Springer, New York, 1998]. An illustrative numerical example is given which shows the results of large bending and axial deformation behaviour for different constitutive relations. This article represents an extended version of a preliminary work published in [H. Irschik and J. Gerstmayr, A hyperelastic Reissner-type model for non-linear shear deformable beams , Proceedings of the Mathmod 09 Vienna, I. Troch and F. Breitenecker, eds., 2009, pp. 1--7].

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Irschik & Johannes Gerstmayr, 2010. "A continuum-mechanics interpretation of Reissner's non-linear shear-deformable beam theory," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 19-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:17:y:2010:i:1:p:19-29
    DOI: 10.1080/13873954.2010.537512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13873954.2010.537512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13873954.2010.537512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:17:y:2010:i:1:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/NMCM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.