IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nmcmxx/v16y2010i5p403-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconstructing the knee joint mechanism from kinematic data

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Reichl
  • Winfried Auzinger
  • Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer
  • Ewa Weinmüller

Abstract

The interpretation of joint kinematics data in terms of displacements is a product of the type of movement, the measurement technique and the underlying model of the joint implemented in optimization procedures. Kinematic constraints reducing the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) are expected to compensate for measurement errors and noise, thus, increasing the reproducibility of joint angles. One approach already successfully applied by several groups approximates the healthy human knee joint as a compound hinge joint with minimal varus/valgus rotation. Most of these optimizations involve an orthogonality constraint. This contribution compares the effect of a model with and without orthogonality constraint on the obtained joint rotation angles. For this purpose, knee joint motion is simulated to generate kinematic data without noise and with normally distributed noise of varying size. For small noise the unconstrained model provides more accurate results, whereas for larger noise this is the case for the constrained model. This can be attributed to the shape of the objective function of the unconstrained model near its minimum.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Reichl & Winfried Auzinger & Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer & Ewa Weinmüller, 2010. "Reconstructing the knee joint mechanism from kinematic data," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 403-415, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:16:y:2010:i:5:p:403-415
    DOI: 10.1080/13873954.2010.507094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13873954.2010.507094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13873954.2010.507094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:16:y:2010:i:5:p:403-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/NMCM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.