IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nmcmxx/v12y2006i5p441-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of discretization methods to solve a population balance model of activated sludge flocculation including aggregation and breakage

Author

Listed:
  • Ingmar Nopens
  • Peter A. Vanrolleghem

Abstract

Population balance models (PBMs) can be used to describe the evolution with time of distributions of properties of individuals. In this study a PBM for activated sludge flocculation including aggregation and breakage processes was investigated. The PBM is an integro-differential equation and does not have an analytical solution. A possibe method of solving the equation at relatively low computational cost is to use discretization. Two different discretization techniques, the fixed pivot and the moving pivot, were compared using geometric grids of different coarseness. Simulations were performed for three different processes: pure aggregation, pure breakage and combined aggregation -- breakage. The results for pure aggregation showed that the fixed pivot overpredicts the large particle sizes when using coarse grids since grid refinement results in a clear downward trend. The predictions of the moving pivot technique show even lower predictions for the large particle sizes, with a slight upward trend for finer grids. This suggests that these predictions are closer to the pseudo-analytical solution (i.e. at infinitely fine grid). For the pure breakage case it was found that the moving pivot predictions collapsed onto one curve. Since a binary breakage case was studied, a fixed pivot with a grid with geometric factor 2 also collapsed onto that curve. Grid refinement for the fixed pivot case resulted in overestimations. Similar conclusions could be drawn for the combined aggregation -- breakage case. Overall, the moving pivot is found to be superior since it produces more accurate predictions, even for much coarser grids. Despite the computational burden, the latter implies a lower computational load.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingmar Nopens & Peter A. Vanrolleghem, 2006. "Comparison of discretization methods to solve a population balance model of activated sludge flocculation including aggregation and breakage," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 441-454, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:12:y:2006:i:5:p:441-454
    DOI: 10.1080/13873950600723376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13873950600723376
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13873950600723376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nmcmxx:v:12:y:2006:i:5:p:441-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/NMCM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.