IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mpopst/v8y2000i3p231-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of measurement error on survey estimates of concurrent partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Morris
  • John O'Gorman

Abstract

This paper uses simulation to examine the role that measurement error may play in survey estimates of concurrent partnerships. Concurrent partnerships accelerate the spread of a sexually transmitted infection, making data on concurrency important for modeling and public health purposes. Methods for collecting data on concurrency typically rely on the reporting of dates. Little is known about the accuracy or reliability of estimates from such data. We examine the possible impact of two types of date reporting error here: unit heaping, which is often imposed by the survey instrument, and recall error. The impact of these errors depends on the underlying behavior pattern. When the interval that persons spend single between partners is small compared to the interval when partnerships overlap, it is easier for errors to create a concurrent partnership where none exists than to eliminate one that does. Under these conditions, measurement errors introduce a slight positive bias in estimates of the prevalence of concurrent partnerships, and a slight negative bias in the length of the overlap.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Morris & John O'Gorman, 2000. "The impact of measurement error on survey estimates of concurrent partnerships," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 231-249.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:8:y:2000:i:3:p:231-249
    DOI: 10.1080/08898480009525484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08898480009525484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08898480009525484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:8:y:2000:i:3:p:231-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GMPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.