IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mpopst/v30y2023i3p195-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust estimation of the population mean using quantile regression under systematic sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Shahzad
  • Ishfaq Ahmad
  • Nadia H. Al-Noor
  • Muhammad Hanif
  • Ibrahim Mufrah Almanjahie

Abstract

Regression ratio mean estimators of a study variable $$Y$$Y are defined as the coefficients provided by the ordinary least-squares regression of $$Y$$Y on a given auxiliary variable $$X$$X. They can be improved by using the coefficient of variation and the coefficient of kurtosis of $$X$$X. The influence of outliers on the estimates of the population mean of $$Y$$Y is neutralized by calculating robust regression coefficients, obtained by the method of either least absolute deviations, Huber-M, Huber-MM, Hampel-M, Tukey-M, or adjusted least squares. These robust coefficients are used to estimate the population mean of $$Y$$Y under simple random sampling. Extension to systematic sampling—which is a probability sampling in which every element of the population has equal probability of inclusion to be drawn—using the coefficients provided by quantile regression—whose coefficients result from the minimization of the sum of absolute deviations rather than from the square deviations from the regression line—requires ratio estimators of the population mean of $$Y$$Y. The mean square errors of these estimators are expressed analytically. If the quantile regression coefficient is greater than the ratio of the covariance between the study and the auxiliary variables to the variance of the auxiliary variable minus a function of the mean or the coefficient of variation, skewness, or kurtosis of $$X$$X and $$Y$$Y, then the proposed robust quantile regression mean estimator of $$Y$$Y is more efficient than the ratio estimators in the presence of outliers under systematic sampling. The reason is that these estimators only use regression coefficients and not the ratio between the population mean and sample means of the auxiliary variable $$X$$X. The aforementioned condition occurs with the values of the case study. For empirical data of 176 forest strips, the proposed estimate of the volume of timber is over 30% more efficient than the ratio estimates based on quantile regression coefficients.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Shahzad & Ishfaq Ahmad & Nadia H. Al-Noor & Muhammad Hanif & Ibrahim Mufrah Almanjahie, 2023. "Robust estimation of the population mean using quantile regression under systematic sampling," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 195-207, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:195-207
    DOI: 10.1080/08898480.2022.2139072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08898480.2022.2139072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08898480.2022.2139072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:195-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GMPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.