IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mpopst/v25y2018i2p99-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitude strength moderates adverse effects to questionnaire design

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Bogner
  • Klaus Pforr
  • Natalja Menold

Abstract

The presentation and visual design of the “don’t know” category in rating scales on respondents’ behavior may have ambivalent effects. The hypothesis is that attitude strength toward the topic influences the respondents’ sensitivity to the graphical design of the scale. A paper-and-pencil questionnaire conducted among 307 German university students contained an experimental variation of the presentation of a “don’t know” category and its visual design. A multinomial logistic regression shows that presenting a “don’t know” category drives respondents toward extreme categories. The visual design of the “don’t know” category influences the distribution of responses, all the more that the respondents’ attitudes toward the item topic are weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Bogner & Klaus Pforr & Natalja Menold, 2018. "Attitude strength moderates adverse effects to questionnaire design," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 99-111, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:25:y:2018:i:2:p:99-111
    DOI: 10.1080/08898480.2018.1439244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08898480.2018.1439244
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08898480.2018.1439244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mpopst:v:25:y:2018:i:2:p:99-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GMPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.