IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i6p1895-1916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranked set sampling imputation methods in presence of correlated measurement errors

Author

Listed:
  • Shashi Bhushan
  • Anoop Kumar

Abstract

Very little attention has been paid by the authors for providing improved imputation methods under correlated measurement errors (CMEs) using various sampling designs. This article addresses several power ratio imputation methods and the resulting estimators under ranked set sampling (RSS) when CMEs are present. The mean square error (MSE) is developed to assess how well the suggested estimators work under CMEs. The effectiveness of the proposed imputation methods and corresponding resultant estimators is assessed by a comprehensive simulation utilizing an artificially generated population. Further, an application of the proposed imputation methods is also provided using real data from Sweden’s municipalities consisting of the total number of seats in 1982 in municipal council taken as study variable and the number of conservative seats in 1982 in municipal council taken as auxiliary variable. The CMEs might arise due to common surveyor biases if the same surveyor collects information on both the “total number of seats in municipal council” and “the number of conservative seats in that municipal council”. The simulation and real data results show that the proposed power ratio imputation methods outperform the mean, conventional ratio, and product imputation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Shashi Bhushan & Anoop Kumar, 2025. "Ranked set sampling imputation methods in presence of correlated measurement errors," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1895-1916, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:6:p:1895-1916
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2352031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2352031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2352031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:6:p:1895-1916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.