IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i6p1676-1701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian reliability acceptance sampling plans under interval censoring

Author

Listed:
  • Rathin Das
  • Biswabrata Pradhan

Abstract

This work considers Bayesian reliability acceptance sampling plan (RASP) under interval censoring. It is considered that the consumer and manufacturer agree on a common lifetime distribution of the product. However, they differ in their assessment of the prior distributions and utility functions because of the adversarial nature of the consumer and manufacturer, but the manufacturer knows the consumer’s utility and prior. The consumer accepts or rejects a lot of products based on his/her own priors about the quality of the product and a utility function. If the consumer rejects the lot, the manufacturer gives additional information on lifetime based on a life test to update the consumer’s belief. The consumer decides on accepting or rejecting the lot based on updated information. The life test is conducted under an interval censoring scheme, where the decision on acceptance or rejection of the lot can be taken sequentially at pre-specified inspection times. The manufacturer’s task is to determine the optimal interval-censoring life testing plan which maximizes his/her utility. Last, we discuss a methodology where the manufacturer does not require knowledge of the consumer’s utility function and prior distribution for planning the life test.

Suggested Citation

  • Rathin Das & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2025. "Bayesian reliability acceptance sampling plans under interval censoring," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1676-1701, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:6:p:1676-1701
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2348080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2348080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2348080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:6:p:1676-1701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.