IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i4p1160-1179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sample test for stochastic block models via the largest singular value

Author

Listed:
  • Kang Fu
  • Jianwei Hu
  • Seydou Keita
  • Hang Liu

Abstract

The stochastic block model is widely used for detecting community structures in network data. However, the research interest in much of the literature focuses on the study of one sample of stochastic block models. Detecting the difference between the two community structures is a less studied issue for stochastic block models. In this article, we propose a novel test statistic based on the largest singular value of a residual matrix obtained by subtracting the geometric mean of two estimated block mean effects from the sum of two observed adjacency matrices. We prove that the null distribution of the proposed test statistic converges in distribution to the Tracy-Widom distribution with index 1, and we show the difference between the two samples for stochastic block models can be tested via the proposed method. We show that the proposed test is asymptotically powerful against alternative models. Further, we extend the proposed method to the degree-corrected stochastic block model. Both simulation studies and real-world data examples indicate that the proposed method works well.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang Fu & Jianwei Hu & Seydou Keita & Hang Liu, 2025. "Two-sample test for stochastic block models via the largest singular value," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1160-1179, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:1160-1179
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2330669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2330669
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2330669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:1160-1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.