IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i2p575-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of objective priors for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha using a balanced random effects model

Author

Listed:
  • Sharkay R. Izally
  • Abraham J. van der Merwe
  • Lizanne Raubenheimer

Abstract

In this article, the reference and probability matching priors for Cronbach’s alpha will be derived. The performance of these two priors will be compared to that of the well-known Jeffreys prior and a divergence prior. Cronbach’s alpha is a measure used to assess the reliability of a set of test items. A simulation study will be considered to compare the performance of the priors, where the coverage rates, average interval lengths, and standard deviations of the interval lengths will be computed. A second simulation study will be considered where the mean relative error will be compared for the various priors using three different loss functions. The following loss functions will be considered, Squared error loss, Absolute error loss, and Linex loss. An illustrative example will also be considered. Throughout the article, the random effects approach will be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharkay R. Izally & Abraham J. van der Merwe & Lizanne Raubenheimer, 2025. "A comparison of objective priors for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha using a balanced random effects model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 575-603, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:575-603
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2315300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2315300
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2315300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:575-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.