IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v54y2025i10p2844-2862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equivalence tests under the non mixture and mixture cure fraction models

Author

Listed:
  • Pao-sheng Shen

Abstract

In this article, we propose equivalence tests for the difference of two survival functions in the presence of cure fraction. We consider both the non mixture cure model (NMCM) and mixture cure model (MCM). We first demonstrate that the existing tests can be used to test equivalence of two improper survival functions under the class of log transformation (LT) and Box-Cox transformation (BCT) NMCM. For the MCM, a logistic regression model is assumed for the probability of being uncured and the class of LT or BCT models are used to describe the distribution of event time for the uncured subjects. Under the MCM, we consider testing separately the null hypothesis of identical cure rate and that of equivalence of two survival functions of the uncured subjects. We also develop a Wald statistic for simultaneously testing whether or not both the maximal difference between cure rates and that between two short-term survival functions fall within some equivalence margins. Simulation results indicate that the proposed tests have a satisfactory size and an adequate power in finite sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Pao-sheng Shen, 2025. "Equivalence tests under the non mixture and mixture cure fraction models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2844-2862, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:10:p:2844-2862
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2024.2376671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2024.2376671
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2024.2376671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:54:y:2025:i:10:p:2844-2862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.