IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i17p6299-6314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoothed empirical likelihood for optimal cut point analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Liu
  • Chunjie Wang
  • Yujing Yao
  • Zhezhen Jin

Abstract

In diagnostic studies, a continuous biomarker is often dichotomized for the diagnosis of binary disease status. Various criteria have been studied for the cut point selection of the continuous biomarker in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, in particular, the Youden index, the closest-to-(0,1) index, and the concordance probability index. Recently, Wang, Tian, and Zhao (2017) established a Wilks theorem for a smoothed empirical likelihood ratio statistic of Youden index. However, it is not directly useful for statistical inference compared to the cut point. In addition, the optimal cut point may vary with different criteria. In this article, we study smoothed empirical likelihood for optimal cut point selection with Youden index, closest-to-(0,1) criterion, and concordance probability. We develop confidence estimation for the optimal cut points based on the smoothed empirical likelihood ratio statistics. We examine the empirical performance by extensive simulation studies. We also illustrate the method with a real dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Liu & Chunjie Wang & Yujing Yao & Zhezhen Jin, 2024. "Smoothed empirical likelihood for optimal cut point analysis," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(17), pages 6299-6314, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:17:p:6299-6314
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2023.2244096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2023.2244096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2023.2244096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:17:p:6299-6314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.