IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i13p4557-4575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Run orders in factorial designs: A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Romario A. Conto López
  • Alexander A. Correa Espinal
  • Olga C. Úsuga Manco

Abstract

Run orders in factorial designs have been a topic of interest in recent decades because the basic principle of randomization does not necessarily eliminate the bias caused by unknown factors and also generates many level changes, making experimentation more expensive. Therefore, the literature in this area has addressed the construction of preestablished run orders to eliminate the bias produced by unknown factors and/or minimize the cost of the experiment. This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review (SLR) and a taxonomical classification of studies about run orders for factorial designs published between 1952 and 2021. The objective here is to describe the findings and main and future research directions in this field. The main components considered in each study and the methodologies they used to obtain run sequences are also highlighted, allowing professionals to select an appropriate ordering for their problem. This review shows that obtaining orderings with good properties for an experimental design with any number of factors and levels is still an unresolved issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Romario A. Conto López & Alexander A. Correa Espinal & Olga C. Úsuga Manco, 2024. "Run orders in factorial designs: A literature review," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(13), pages 4557-4575, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:13:p:4557-4575
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2023.2185472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2023.2185472
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2023.2185472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:13:p:4557-4575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.