IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v52y2023i1p19-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertain logistic and Box-Cox regression analysis with maximum likelihood estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Fang
  • Yiping Hong
  • Zaiying Zhou
  • Wenhui Chen

Abstract

Although the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for the uncertain discrete models has long been an academic interest, it has yet to be proposed in the literature. Thus, this study proposes the uncertain MLE for discrete models in the framework of the uncertainty theory, such as the uncertain logistic regression model. We also generalize the estimation proposed by Lio and Liu and obtain the uncertain MLE for non-linear continuous models, such as the uncertain Box-Cox regression model. Our proposed methods provide a useful tool for making inferences regarding non-linear data that is precisely or imprecisely observed, especially data based on degrees of belief, such as an expert’s experimental data. We demonstrate our methodology by calculating proposed estimates and providing forecast values and confidence intervals for numerical examples. Moreover, we evaluate our proposed models via residual analysis and the cross-validation method. The study enriches the definition of the uncertain MLE, thus making it easy to construct estimation and prediction methods for general uncertainty models.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Fang & Yiping Hong & Zaiying Zhou & Wenhui Chen, 2023. "Uncertain logistic and Box-Cox regression analysis with maximum likelihood estimation," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 19-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:1:p:19-38
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1908562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1908562
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2021.1908562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:1:p:19-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.