IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i19p6667-6682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Bayesian nonparametric density estimation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Bedoui
  • Ori Rosen

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a nonparametric Bayesian approach for Lindsey and penalized Gaussian mixtures methods. We compare these methods with the Dirichlet process mixture model. Our approach is a Bayesian nonparametric method not based solely on a parametric family of probability distributions. Thus, the fitted models are more robust to model misspecification. Also, with the Bayesian approach, we have the entire posterior distribution of our parameter of interest; it can be summarized through credible intervals, mean, median, standard deviation, quantiles, etc. The Lindsey, penalized Gaussian mixtures, and Dirichlet process mixture methods are reviewed. The estimations are performed via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The penalized Gaussian mixtures method is implemented via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC). We show that under certain regularity conditions, and as n increases, the posterior distribution of the weights converges to a Normal distribution. Simulation results and data analysis are reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Bedoui & Ori Rosen, 2022. "Comparison of Bayesian nonparametric density estimation methods," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(19), pages 6667-6682, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:19:p:6667-6682
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1864828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1864828
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1864828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:19:p:6667-6682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.