IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i14p4940-4956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence intervals with maximal average power

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Bartels
  • Johanna Mielke
  • Ekkehard Glimm

Abstract

We propose a frequentist testing procedure that maintains a defined coverage and is optimal in the sense that it gives maximal power to detect deviations from a null hypothesis when the alternative to the null hypothesis is sampled from a pre-specified distribution (the prior distribution). Selecting a prior distribution allows to tune the decision rule. This leads to an increased power, if the true data generating distribution happens to be compatible with the prior. It comes at the cost of losing power, if the data generating distribution or the observed data are incompatible with the prior. We illustrate the proposed approach for a binomial experiment, which is sufficiently simple such that the decision sets can be illustrated in figures, which should facilitate an intuitive understanding. The potential beyond the simple example will be discussed: the approach is generic in that the test is defined based on the likelihood function and the prior only. It is comparatively simple to implement and efficient to execute, since it does not rely on Minimax optimization. Conceptually it is interesting to note that for constructing the testing procedure the Bayesian posterior probability distribution is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Bartels & Johanna Mielke & Ekkehard Glimm, 2022. "Confidence intervals with maximal average power," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(14), pages 4940-4956, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:14:p:4940-4956
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1828465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1828465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1828465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:14:p:4940-4956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.