IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v51y2022i14p4921-4939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian prior information fusion for power law process via evidence theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jun-Ming Hu
  • Hong-Zhong Huang
  • Yan-Feng Li
  • Hui-Ying Gao

Abstract

The power law process (PLP) is widely used to analyze the failures of repairable systems, and the PLP parameter estimation is the primary concern for reliability assessment or maintenance decision making. Although the Bayesian estimation of the PLP has been studied in existing research, little attention has been paid to how to obtain its prior distribution, especially when the prior information is coming from multiple sources. To address this problem, a framework for Bayesian prior information fusion using evidence theory is proposed in this paper. This framework first uses evidence theory to represent the prior information from multiple sources or experts and then combines them into fused information. Based on the belief and plausibility functions of the fused information, the prior distribution is bounded by an upper and lower probability density functions which are derived by moment equivalence. A case study is also carried out to verify and illustrate the proposed method. The results show that this proposed approach is beneficial for the Bayesian estimation of the power law process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun-Ming Hu & Hong-Zhong Huang & Yan-Feng Li & Hui-Ying Gao, 2022. "Bayesian prior information fusion for power law process via evidence theory," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(14), pages 4921-4939, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:14:p:4921-4939
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1828464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1828464
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1828464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:14:p:4921-4939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.