IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v50y2021i8p1709-1727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the generalized mean have the potential to control outliers?

Author

Listed:
  • Soumalya Mukhopadhyay
  • Amlan Jyoti Das
  • Ayanendranath Basu
  • Aditya Chatterjee
  • Sabyasachi Bhattacharya

Abstract

The efficacy of the generalized mean in controlling outliers is explored in this paper. We found that in the presence of outliers in the data, the generalized mean estimates the mean of the dominating population more accurately compared to the usual maximum likelihood estimator. Thus the generalized mean allows stable estimation of the target mean parameter without invoking the complications of sophisticated robust techniques. For example, while doing experimentation on the growth of species, the data on the size or growth rate of a particular species are often contaminated with those from other species, where the behavior of the latter component is similar to that of a bunch of outlying observations. To carry out realistic growth related inference on the mean growth of the primary component in this situation, the generalized mean is recommended as a useful tool to the experimental biologists. There are innumerable other real-life scenarios where a suitably chosen generalized mean can provide better input in doing inference with real data compared to the arithmetic and other standard means.

Suggested Citation

  • Soumalya Mukhopadhyay & Amlan Jyoti Das & Ayanendranath Basu & Aditya Chatterjee & Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, 2021. "Does the generalized mean have the potential to control outliers?," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1709-1727, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:8:p:1709-1727
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1652320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2019.1652320
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2019.1652320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:8:p:1709-1727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.