IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v50y2021i16p3769-3789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variational Bayesian analysis for Wiener degradation model with random effects

Author

Listed:
  • Shirong Zhou
  • Ancha Xu
  • Yongqiang Lian
  • Yincai Tang

Abstract

Random-effects Wiener degradation models have been widely used in the literature, to characterize unit-to-unit variability in a population. Bayesian inference for such models mainly relay on stochastic simulation techniques, such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. However, MCMC approach will converge slowly or fail to converge for large volume data. In this paper, the variational Bayesian (VB) approach is proposed as an alternative tool for MCMC, which makes inference of Wiener degradation models with random effects more suitable for large inspection data sets. Despite of utilizing mean field methodology for VB approach, there are also certain limitations in model inference. Therefore, a three-step method is developed and embed into the VB approach, and statistical inference based on our VB approach is established. Numerical examples are provided to compare with MCMC method in terms of cost in time and accuracy in estimation for large inspection data problem. The proposed VB approach provides almost the same accuracy as MCMC, while its computational burden is much lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirong Zhou & Ancha Xu & Yongqiang Lian & Yincai Tang, 2021. "Variational Bayesian analysis for Wiener degradation model with random effects," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(16), pages 3769-3789, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:16:p:3769-3789
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1846747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2020.1846747
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2020.1846747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:16:p:3769-3789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.