IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v49y2020i16p3933-3949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining answers to direct and indirect questions: An implementation of Kuk’s randomized response model

Author

Listed:
  • Said Farooq Shah
  • Zawar Hussain
  • Salman Arif Cheema

Abstract

In this article, we propose a two folded approach for estimation of the population proportion of a sensitive attribute. The rationale of proposed technique is to give respondents choice if they want to avail randomized device or not. Thus, our technique is inherently capable of entertaining the responses attained through direct questioning and by employing randomization device, as well. We believe that free to choose policy will be helpful to develop a curtsy between interviewer and respondent (which is highly desirable, especially when sensitive issue is under consideration) and thus enhances the survey reliability. The proposed technique is developed for simple random sampling, at first, and then extended to stratified random sampling. The superior performance of proposed technique in comparison to the Kuk (1990) method is demonstrated throughout this article. We provide algebraic, graphical and numerical evidences in support of our proposed technique. Furthermore, we also offer cost analysis considering most commonly used cost functions in the literature of survey research.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Farooq Shah & Zawar Hussain & Salman Arif Cheema, 2020. "Combining answers to direct and indirect questions: An implementation of Kuk’s randomized response model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(16), pages 3933-3949, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:49:y:2020:i:16:p:3933-3949
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:49:y:2020:i:16:p:3933-3949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.