IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v46y2017i2p786-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating and contextualizing the attenuation of odds ratios due to non collapsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Burgess

Abstract

The odds ratio is a measure commonly used for expressing the association between an exposure and a binary outcome. A feature of the odds ratio is that its value depends on the choice of the distribution over which the probabilities in the odds ratio are evaluated. In particular, this means that an odds ratio conditional on a covariate may have a different value from an odds ratio marginal on the covariate, even if the covariate is not associated with the exposure (not a confounder). We define the individual odds ratio (IORs) and population odds ratios (PORs) as the ratio of the odds of the outcome for a unit increase in the exposure, respectively, for an individual in the population and for the whole population, in which case the odds are averaged across the population. The attenuation of conditional odds ratio, marginal odds ratio, and PORs from the IOR is demonstrated in a realistic simulation exercise. The degree of attenuation differs in the whole population and in a case–control sample, and the property of invariance to outcome-dependent sampling is only true for the IOR. The relevance of the non collapsibility of odds ratios in a range of methodological areas is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Burgess, 2017. "Estimating and contextualizing the attenuation of odds ratios due to non collapsibility," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 786-804, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:2:p:786-804
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1006778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2015.1006778
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2015.1006778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:2:p:786-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.