IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v46y2017i11p5419-5442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weibull lagged effect step-stress model with competing risks

Author

Listed:
  • Joleen Beltrami

Abstract

In many survival analysis studies, failure can come from one of several competing risks. Additionally, where survival times are lengthy, researchers can increase stress levels to cause units to fail faster. One type of accelerated testing is a step-stress test where the increase is presented in quantum jumps at predetermined time points. If the impact of the increase is not immediately attained, an interim lag period is modeled. In this article, we propose a two-competing risk step-stress model with a lag period where each independent risk follows a Weibull lifetime distribution, the interim lag period is linear, and the attainment point is assumed known. We obtain the maximum likelihood estimators and the observed information matrix; we construct confidence intervals and provide estimates of coverage probabilities using large sample theory, percentile bootstrap, and bias-corrected accelerated (BCa) bootstrap methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Joleen Beltrami, 2017. "Weibull lagged effect step-stress model with competing risks," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 5419-5442, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:11:p:5419-5442
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1102283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2015.1102283
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2015.1102283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:11:p:5419-5442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.