IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v45y2016i23p7060-7074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of allocating sample size rationally into individual regions under heterogeneous effect size in a multiregional trial by a fixed effect model and a random effect model

Author

Listed:
  • Feng-shou Ko

Abstract

Recently, sponsors and regulatory authorities pay much attention on the multiregional trial because it can shorten the drug lag or the time lag for approval, simultaneous drug development, submission, and approval in the world. However, many studies have shown that genetic determinants may mediate variability among persons in response to a drug. Thus, some therapeutics benefit part of treated patients. It means that the assumption of homogeneous effect size is not suitable for multiregional trials. In this paper, we conduct the sample size determination of a multiregional clinical trial calculated by fixed effect and random effect under the assumption of heterogeneous effect size. The performances of fixed effect and random effect on allocating sample size on a specific region are compared by statistical criteria for consistency between the region of interest and overall results.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng-shou Ko, 2016. "Comparisons of allocating sample size rationally into individual regions under heterogeneous effect size in a multiregional trial by a fixed effect model and a random effect model," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(23), pages 7060-7074, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:23:p:7060-7074
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.974823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2014.974823
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2014.974823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:23:p:7060-7074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.