IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v45y2016i13p3970-3992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayes and robust Bayes predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under a precautionary loss function

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Golparvar
  • Ali Karimnezhad
  • Ahmad Parsian

Abstract

This paper deals with Bayes, robust Bayes, and minimax predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under an asymmetric precautionary loss function. In Bayesian statistical inference, the goal is to obtain optimal rules under a specified loss function and an explicit prior distribution over the parameter space. However, in practice, we are not able to specify the prior totally or when a problem must be solved by two statisticians, they may agree on the choice of the prior but not the values of the hyperparameters. A common approach to the prior uncertainty in Bayesian analysis is to choose a class of prior distributions and compute some functional quantity. This is known as Robust Bayesian analysis which provides a way to consider the prior knowledge in terms of a class of priors Γ for global prevention against bad choices of hyperparameters. Under a scale invariant precautionary loss function, we deal with robust Bayes predictions of Y based on X. We carried out a simulation study and a real data analysis to illustrate the practical utility of the prediction procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Golparvar & Ali Karimnezhad & Ahmad Parsian, 2016. "Bayes and robust Bayes predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under a precautionary loss function," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(13), pages 3970-3992, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:13:p:3970-3992
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.915041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2014.915041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2014.915041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Karimnezhad & Ahmad Parsian, 2018. "Most stable sample size determination in clinical trials," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(3), pages 437-454, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:13:p:3970-3992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.