IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v44y2015i3p564-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for Random Effects in Growth Curve Models

Author

Listed:
  • Zaixing Li

Abstract

Growth curve models (GCMs) are useful and Demidenko (2004) considered the presence of random effects under the normal assumptions about random effects and random errors. It is also of interest to remove distribution assumptions to investigate the same problem. A difference-based test is constructed for GCMs, which can be regarded as an extension of Li and Zhu (2010)’s method and a complement to Demidenko (2004) where his test is exact in small samples. Without any distribution assumptions, our test derived for GCMs is asymptotically a standard normal. The power properties are also investigated. Besides, simulations are carried out to examine its performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaixing Li, 2015. "Testing for Random Effects in Growth Curve Models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 564-572, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:564-572
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2012.746988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2012.746988
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2012.746988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shinpei Imori & Dietrich Rosen & Ryoya Oda, 2022. "Growth Curve Model with Bilinear Random Coefficients," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 477-508, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:564-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.