IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v44y2015i15p3266-3277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Theoretical Comparisons of Negative Binomial and Zero-Inflated Poisson Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Changyong Feng
  • Hongyue Wang
  • Yu Han
  • Yinglin Xia
  • Naiji Lu
  • Xin M. Tu

Abstract

In this article, we compare the zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and negative binomial (NB) distributions based on three most important criteria: the probability of zero, the mean value, and the variance. Our results show that with same mean value and variance, the ZIP distribution always has a larger probability of zeros; with same mean value and probability of zeros, the NB distribution always has a larger variance; and with same variance and probability of zeros, the ZIP distribution always has a larger mean value. We also study the properties of Vuong test in model selection in three cases by simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Changyong Feng & Hongyue Wang & Yu Han & Yinglin Xia & Naiji Lu & Xin M. Tu, 2015. "Some Theoretical Comparisons of Negative Binomial and Zero-Inflated Poisson Distributions," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(15), pages 3266-3277, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:15:p:3266-3277
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2013.823203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2013.823203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2013.823203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:44:y:2015:i:15:p:3266-3277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.