IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v48y2025i2p134-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderating Effect of Gender and Academic Background in Open Government Data (OGD) User Adoption and Usage

Author

Listed:
  • Charalampos Alexopoulos
  • Nina Rizun
  • Stuti Saxena

Abstract

The present research seeks to rest its edifice on the proposition that the role of gender and academic background of a user in terms of the technical/liberal/hospitality and care domain impinges upon the Open Government Data (OGD) adoption and usage. Specifically, the adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model is being deployed to empirically validate how the OGD usage and adoption vary among the 313 respondents in a leading private university in India in line with their academic background and gender. Findings from the study via Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) show that academic background and gender are moderating Behavioural Intention to use and adopt OGD through Performance Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, Data Quality, System Quality, Information Quality and Trust, whilst the Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) shows that there are differences between the technical and liberal/hospitality and care cohorts in terms of their gender vis-a-vis Voluntariness of Use and System Quality vis-a-via the Behavioural Intention to adopt and use OGD.

Suggested Citation

  • Charalampos Alexopoulos & Nina Rizun & Stuti Saxena, 2025. "The Moderating Effect of Gender and Academic Background in Open Government Data (OGD) User Adoption and Usage," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 134-145, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:48:y:2025:i:2:p:134-145
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2024.2327320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2024.2327320
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2024.2327320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:48:y:2025:i:2:p:134-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.