IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v47y2024i1p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Public Servants Confront Common Dilemmas in Public Engagement: Evidence from a Survey of Canadian Public Officials

Author

Listed:
  • Carey Doberstein

Abstract

Governments engage the public and stakeholders at various scales and scopes prior to the launch of new policy initiatives or reforms to existing programs. This article presents the results of a survey of Canadian public servants (N = 663) in which respondents were presented with common dilemmas faced when conducting public engagement, such as those related to time pressure, inclusion, representation, and public resistance, all of which represent key trade-offs inherent in this work, and were asked to recommend a path forward from binary choices. In response to common dilemmas of public engagement, public servants working in this area in Canada show clear patterns in terms of their reactions to time pressure and inclusion/exclusion considerations, but appear divided on how to resolve dilemmas as they relate to representation and public resistance – the two dilemmas with more political dimensions. These findings suggest that public servants working in this realm exhibit an adaptability and political sensitivity to the particular public engagement issue area and scenario presented to them, rather than relying upon idealized models of public engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Carey Doberstein, 2024. "How Public Servants Confront Common Dilemmas in Public Engagement: Evidence from a Survey of Canadian Public Officials," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 57-67, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:57-67
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2022.2085299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2022.2085299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2022.2085299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.