IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v46y2023i11p741-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsiveness in Ghanaian Healthcare: The Survey of Inpatients

Author

Listed:
  • Fortune Afi Agbi

Abstract

An essential characteristic of an effective healthcare system is the responsiveness to patients’ legitimate expectations. Maintaining the responsiveness of health organizations at a high level requires constant evaluation of their situation as perceived by patients. The aim of this study was to assess the perceived responsiveness of inpatients of public healthcare facilities in the South Tongu District, Ghana.This study used a convenient sampling approach to collect data from a total of 200 inpatients who were selected systematically at the time of their discharge. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) responsiveness questionnaire was used as the research tool to assess responsiveness. T-test and ANOVA was used for comparing the mean values. More than half of the hospitalized patients ranked the general responsiveness as good (73%). Our results ranked the different levels of responsiveness perceived by patients and revealed the areas that require further attention for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Fortune Afi Agbi, 2023. "Responsiveness in Ghanaian Healthcare: The Survey of Inpatients," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 741-750, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:46:y:2023:i:11:p:741-750
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.2016827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2021.2016827
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2021.2016827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:46:y:2023:i:11:p:741-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.