Author
Listed:
- Anh-Tuan Doan
- Aila Khan
- Quan Tran
- Scott Holmes
Abstract
The corporate governance literature focuses on the firm-level corrupt environments of firm performance and does not pay sufficient attention to the importance of competition and CEO gender. Motivated by recent developments integrating a bribery perspective with contextual moderators in firm efficiency studies, this study attempts to present empirical evidence regarding the bribery-efficiency relationship in Vietnamese small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from 2011 to 2015. Using the stochastic frontier approach to estimate firm technical efficiency scores, we find that an environment characterized by a high level of bribery has an adverse effect on firm efficiency. We also find that a dispersed business environment characterized by considerable heterogeneity in corruption perception is associated with an increase in firm efficiency. Furthermore, the results suggest that firms facing competitive forces are associated with less efficiency relative to firms without pressure. Moreover, efficiency tends to be greater for firms with a lower propensity to behave corruptly, such as firms managed by females. To investigate whether the effects of bribery on efficiency are dependent on firm competitive pressure and gender attitudes, we check whether these relations are particularly strong for firms highly pressured by competition and firms run by a female CEO; our results show strong support for this conjecture. The effects of competition and gender are particularly strong for firms operating in provinces with a low level of transparent competitiveness, while no effect is observed for firms that operate in provinces with a high level of competitive governance.
Suggested Citation
Anh-Tuan Doan & Aila Khan & Quan Tran & Scott Holmes, 2022.
"Bribery Environments and Manufacturing SME Efficiency: Evidence from a Transitional Economy,"
International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 453-474, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:5:p:453-474
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.2010753
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:5:p:453-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.