IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v44y2021i4p300-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese Civil Servants Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • César Grima Madureira
  • Belén Rando
  • David Ferraz

Abstract

As part of managerial reform process, in 2004 the Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) was set up in Portugal. This study aimed to analyze the perceptions of Portuguese civil servants on this appraisal system. A second drive was to understand how those perceptions change depending on what extent the model is perceived as fair or not. A survey was carried out and data were collected from 2066 civil servants, including managers. The results show very negative perceptions, in particular regarding SIADAP’s objectivity, transparency and fairness. Also, Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc paired comparisons reveal that civil servants who see the system as “unfair” tend to have more negative perceptions on it than those who see it as “fair” or those who are not sure about the fairness of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • César Grima Madureira & Belén Rando & David Ferraz, 2021. "The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese Civil Servants Perceptions," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 300-310, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:4:p:300-310
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:4:p:300-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.