IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v44y2021i2p91-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Networks in Chronic Disease Prevention: What Factors Inhibit Partnering for Funding?

Author

Listed:
  • Liza Hopkins
  • Daniel Chamberlain
  • Fabian Held
  • Therese Riley
  • Jean Zhou Jing Wang
  • Kathleen Conte

Abstract

Inter-organisational partnering is seen as an effective mechanism for improving the delivery of chronic disease interventions in communities. Yet even in communities where organisations across multiple sectors are well connected and collaborative in other ways, when it comes to partnering for joint-funding, multiple barriers inhibit the establishment of formal partnerships. To understand why this is so, we examined quantitative and qualitative data from organisations in an Australian community and compared the findings with a review of the published literature in this area. We found that even organisations which are well connected through informal network arrangements face pressure from funding bodies to form more formalised inter-organisational partnerships. Community based organisations also recognise that partnerships are desirable mechanisms for service improvement; however, barriers to joint-funding partnerships exist which include restrictions imposed by funding bodies on the way grants are designed, implemented, and administered. Additional barriers at the community level include organisational capacity for partnership work, intra-organisational restrictions and timing issues. Policy makers must recognise and address the barriers to partnerships which exist within funding structures and at the community level in order to increase partnering opportunities to improve service delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Liza Hopkins & Daniel Chamberlain & Fabian Held & Therese Riley & Jean Zhou Jing Wang & Kathleen Conte, 2021. "Collaborative Networks in Chronic Disease Prevention: What Factors Inhibit Partnering for Funding?," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 91-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:2:p:91-99
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1669177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2019.1669177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2019.1669177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:2:p:91-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.