Author
Listed:
- Clayton Robson Moreira da Silva
- Cíntia Vanessa Monteiro Germano Aquino
- Laís Vieira Castro Oliveira
- Eveline Pinheiro Beserra
- Cláudia Buhamra Abreu Romero
Abstract
Government actions can help to convince populations to participate in the resolution of collective problems. However, in order for citizens to feel motivated to contribute to managing a public health problem, it is necessary to develop a relationship based on trust. Therefore, this study analyzes the effect of trust in government on the behaviour of citizens related to the adoption of social isolation during the Covid-19 pandemic, through a survey with 1,154 citizens from the state of Ceará in northeastern Brazil. Additionally, the factors which are associated with the adoption of social isolation and trust in government were verified. The results showed that trust in government positively affects citizens’ behavior related to social isolation, suggesting that the bond between government and society, developed through citizens’ trust in government, contributes to more effective combatting of Covid-19. In addition, it was identified that gender, education, and occupation are associated with the adoption of social isolation and trust in government. Place of residence and income are associated only with the adoption of social isolation. Finally, it was verified that people who live with someone in the high-risk group for Covid-19 tend to comply with social isolation more strictly and trust the government more. In contrast, people who tested positive or presented symptoms of the disease comply with social isolation less effectively and trust the government less.
Suggested Citation
Clayton Robson Moreira da Silva & Cíntia Vanessa Monteiro Germano Aquino & Laís Vieira Castro Oliveira & Eveline Pinheiro Beserra & Cláudia Buhamra Abreu Romero, 2021.
"Trust in Government and Social Isolation during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Brazil,"
International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11-12), pages 974-983, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:11-12:p:974-983
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1920611
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:11-12:p:974-983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.