IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v43y2020i5p392-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perception of Rentier Elites in the Middle East and North Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid E. Ali

Abstract

Lack of cohesion among the elites within a society invites conflict. However, the robustness of the elites’ power is demonstrated by their capacity to recycle, propelling the system to persist. There is a great degree of ingrained public mistrust in the elite despite the latter’s regeneration, because of their inclination to build bureaucratic systems that are costly in terms of treasure. Despite waves of revolutions and uprisings in MENA, the political outcomes were no different in style from their predecessors. In some cases, it was simply a reproduction of autocracies and cronyism through the revolving door of power and wealth. The common denominator among elites is how to capture the state’s rents in order to maximize their own self-interest. Using the Arab Barometer data, our study will not be focused on the political identity of the elite, but on public perception in evaluating public institutions and political attitudes. Elites are perceived negatively because they missed opportunities to provide exemplary leadership, as well as economic development and accountability. The outcomes are political turmoil, social injustice and economic inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid E. Ali, 2020. "Public Perception of Rentier Elites in the Middle East and North Africa," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 392-403, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:5:p:392-403
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1677710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2019.1677710
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2019.1677710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:5:p:392-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.