IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v43y2020i4p326-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentives for Better Public Outcomes? Evidence from Public Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Rauh

Abstract

There is disagreement between the theoretical and empirical literature as to whether economic incentives can lead to better public outcomes. Work in this arena has largely consisted of formal modeling or studies within sectors that have a specific performance requirement over which citizens or bureaucrats have strong levels of influence such as welfare-to-work programs or education. Even in these studies the results have been decidedly mixed. This manuscript examines the role of incentives in public hospitals, a context where administrators are hard-pressed to ignore other standards in favor of the known payoff requirement. Using data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services on hospital performance this study evaluates how the imposition of penalties on Medicare reimbursements affected the readmission ratios in public sector hospitals. Findings suggest that incentives have no effect. Additionally, the author suggests that the structure of public organizations makes it difficult to effectively implement incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Rauh, 2020. "Incentives for Better Public Outcomes? Evidence from Public Hospitals," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 326-340, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:4:p:326-340
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1636391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2019.1636391
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2019.1636391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:43:y:2020:i:4:p:326-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.