IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v42y2019i7p583-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sources of Legitimacy in Metropolitan Governance: A Comparative Case Study of Governance Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Arto Haveri
  • Helena Tolkki
  • Inga Nyholm
  • Jenni Airaksinen

Abstract

Legitimacy is a central factor in democratic administrative systems, as it determines the success-or failure-of governance structures. In this article, we search for the sources of legitimacy in metropolitan governance by focusing on governance tiers and mechanisms. Auckland, Dublin, Oslo, and Montreal serve as empirical examples. We highlight the strengths and limitations of different types of metropolitan governance structures, and identify factors that may help to establish long-lasting governance structures. To be legitimate, metropolitan governance must take place at a contextually legitimate administrative level, and the governance mechanisms must be in harmony with a legitimate administrative actor.

Suggested Citation

  • Arto Haveri & Helena Tolkki & Inga Nyholm & Jenni Airaksinen, 2019. "Sources of Legitimacy in Metropolitan Governance: A Comparative Case Study of Governance Structures," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 583-595, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:42:y:2019:i:7:p:583-595
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1491598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2018.1491598
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2018.1491598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:42:y:2019:i:7:p:583-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.