IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v40y2017i8p637-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative Styles in the OECD: Bureaucratic Policy-Making beyond Formal Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Enkler
  • Sylvia Schmidt
  • Steffen Eckhard
  • Christoph Knill
  • Stephan Grohs

Abstract

As we know from comparative public policy, bureaucracies contribute to a considerable degree to the contents and the ways of policy-making. One important driver of administrative policy-making are their specific “styles” or “cultures”. “Administrative styles” are understood here as the standard operating procedures and routines that characterize the behavior and activities of administrative bodies in initiating, drafting and implementing policy. In this article, we convey the concept of Administrative Styles to the level of International Organizations (IOs) and apply it to the Organization for Economic Development and Co-Operation (OECD). The article proceeds in three steps: First, the concept of administrative styles is introduced and refined. Drawing on expert interviews with OECD staff, we secondly show that consideration of OECD administrative styles significantly advances the literature’s understanding of the organization. Finally, we give an outlook on new research avenues and the relevance of our findings for the study of International Public Administrations (IPAs) more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Enkler & Sylvia Schmidt & Steffen Eckhard & Christoph Knill & Stephan Grohs, 2017. "Administrative Styles in the OECD: Bureaucratic Policy-Making beyond Formal Rules," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 637-648, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:8:p:637-648
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1186176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naqib Ullah Khan & Peng Zhongyi & Wajid Alim & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2024. "Examining the dynamics of pro-social rule-breaking among grassroots public servants," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:8:p:637-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.