IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v40y2017i14p1223-1236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Po-Kuan Wu
  • Mads Dagnis Jensen

Abstract

This article examines how, if at all, the changed economic order in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 2008 has shaped the relationship between the EU and China. Theoretically, two prevalent opposing narratives in the public discourse are presented and linked to two crude versions of mercantilism and economic liberalism in the scholarly literature. The mercantilist line of reasoning posits that China will gain more political weight with its increasing economic strength. The economic liberal line of reasoning suggests that China’s economic weight does not translate into political power. These two opposing theoretical claims are examined by process tracing two most likely cases. This article concludes that despite its increased economic strength, China has enjoyed limited success in persuading the EU and its member states to change their position(s) on policy areas involving strategic interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Po-Kuan Wu & Mads Dagnis Jensen, 2017. "Examining the EU-China Relationship in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(14), pages 1223-1236, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:14:p:1223-1236
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:14:p:1223-1236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.