IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v40y2017i14p1197-1210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disentangling Actors from Their Environment? Pitfalls and Added-Value of the Strategic-Choice Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Michaël Tatham

Abstract

This article argues that the Strategic-Choice Approach (SCA) put forward by Lake and Powell (1999b) can be further developed in two directions. First, the article highlights the challenge posed by the interdependence between actors and their environment. From this it draws two conclusions. A) The SCA approach is most fruitful for synchronic analysis but more challenging to implement in a diachronic research design. B) The interdependence between actors and their environment can be lessened by distinguishing between three types of actor preferences: meta, ranked, and pragmatic-preferences. Second, it argues that the SCA is an ideal framework to combine qualitative and quantitative research designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaël Tatham, 2017. "Disentangling Actors from Their Environment? Pitfalls and Added-Value of the Strategic-Choice Approach," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(14), pages 1197-1210, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:14:p:1197-1210
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1295269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295269
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:40:y:2017:i:14:p:1197-1210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.