IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v26y2003i5p473-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Understanding of Political Participation: Challenging the Myth of Political Indifference in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Wai‐Man Lam

Abstract

The characterization of Hong Kong's political culture as one of indifference deserves further examination as the inquiries conducted by proponents of the indifference framework have all used a narrow definition of political participation. This paper begins with a critique of the inherent narrowness of orthodox definitions of political participation: political participation as acts making demands on a government; as lawful activities; and as activities vis‐a‐vis one government. Contrast these assumptions, the author contends that political participation needs to be understood as activities that include both making demands on and showing support for a government, as well as both lawful and unlawful activities. Furthermore, the author refutes the one‐government‐locus theme of the orthodox concept and proposes a three‐government‐loci theme that is more relevant to the historical experience of the colonial Hong Kong. The political relevance of the social domain and its implications on broadening the definition of political participation are discussed. Finally, the author argues for the importance of considering discursive participation as a form of political participation in Hong Kong.

Suggested Citation

  • Wai‐Man Lam, 2003. "An Alternative Understanding of Political Participation: Challenging the Myth of Political Indifference in Hong Kong," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 473-496.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:26:y:2003:i:5:p:473-496
    DOI: 10.1081/PAD-120019232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1081/PAD-120019232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1081/PAD-120019232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:26:y:2003:i:5:p:473-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.