IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v1y2010i1p85-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to trust breaches: The domain specificity of trust and the role of affect

Author

Listed:
  • Chao C. Chen
  • Patrick Saparito
  • Liuba Belkin

Abstract

Trust researchers have called for additional work examining trust breaches and trust erosion, as well as an explicit inclusion of affect in trust models. This paper directly responds to these calls. Based on a critical analysis and extension of Mayer, Davis and Schoorman's (1995) integrative trust model, we examine the relative amount of positive affect associated with each dimension of trustworthiness (i.e., ability, integrity and benevolence). We further explore how breaches of different trustworthiness expectations for a particular joint activity influence trust erosion of the overall relationship. Finally, we identify specific negative emotions that mediate trust breaches and trust erosion.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao C. Chen & Patrick Saparito & Liuba Belkin, 2010. "Responding to trust breaches: The domain specificity of trust and the role of affect," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 85-106, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:85-106
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2011.552438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2011.552438
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2011.552438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:85-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.