IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v14y2024i2p188-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social trust during the pandemic: Longitudinal evidence from three waves of the Swiss household panel study

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Saaranen

Abstract

In this study, I analyse whether and why people’s social trust, the belief that most people can be trusted, changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. My analysis is guided by two different approaches to potential dynamics in social trust, (1) the settled disposition model which advocates for stability within individuals over time, and (2) the active updating model claiming that crisis-induced experiences may leave a lasting scar on people’s trust. Using nationally representative longitudinal data from the Swiss Household Panel and comparing patterns of change before, during and after the outbreak of the pandemic, I found that an exceptionally large share of respondents displayed a decline in social trust in spring 2020. However, in most cases, trust quickly recovered to pre-crisis levels shortly afterwards, thus strengthening the hypothesis that people’s social trust tends to fluctuate around a certain set point. Among a range of potential individual-level determinants for the short-lived drop in social trust, only attitudes towards the government’s handling of the crisis stick out as significant drivers of change.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Saaranen, 2024. "Social trust during the pandemic: Longitudinal evidence from three waves of the Swiss household panel study," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 188-212, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:188-212
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2024.2385534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2024.2385534
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2024.2385534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:188-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.