IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v14y2024i2p127-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations

Author

Listed:
  • Koen Verhoest
  • Dominika Latusek
  • Frédérique Six
  • Libby Maman
  • Yannis Papadopoulos
  • Rahel M. Schomaker
  • Jarle Trondal

Abstract

The relationship between trust and distrust in public governance is still an open question. In the literature, three different perspectives on how trust and distrust are related are intensively debated: (1) trust and distrust as two ends of the same conceptual continuum; (2) trust and distrust as opposites, but with neutral ground in between; and (3) trust and distrust as related, yet distinct concepts. Employing a new measure for distrust and by using perceptual data on trust and distrust in regulatory agencies from multiple types of stakeholders in nine countries and three sectors, this article shows that high trust and high distrust can co-exist at the same time, and that trust and distrust are negatively correlated only to a limited extent. Moreover, while trustworthiness correlates strongly with trust, trustworthiness does not or only weakly correlate with distrust in a negative way. These findings are robust even when controlling for respondents' characteristics, different types of stakeholders, sectors and countries. This suggests that in public governance settings trust and distrust should be considered as distinct concepts, and the article calls for more research into the distinctiveness of the measurement, causes and effects of distrust, compared to trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen Verhoest & Dominika Latusek & Frédérique Six & Libby Maman & Yannis Papadopoulos & Rahel M. Schomaker & Jarle Trondal, 2024. "Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 127-156, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:127-156
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:127-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.