Author
Listed:
- Salah Alhammadi
- Khaled O. Alotaibi
- Dzikri F. Hakam
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate Islamic banking performance based on higher ethical objectives enshrined within Sharī‘ah (Islamic legal rulings); namely, Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah. First, we examine the importance of both ethical and social concerns on bank performance in general. Second, we analyse the ethical and social performance of Islamic banks (IBs) based on the Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Index (MSI) that emphasises disclosures related to education, social justice, and redistribution of wealth. Third, we investigate how far IBs have gone towards achieving Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah goals during the last decade, post-global financial crises (GFC) period, with a particular focus on Indonesia as a case study. Hence, testing whether IBs achieve socio-economic justice and attain best practice by securing social good. The selected banks’ annual reports were examined, applying content analysis to obtain the necessary data, using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to determine the level of Maqāṣid in the sample. Empirical evidence suggests that conventional performance measurements do not truly reflect IBs’ higher ethical objectives, and create a deficiency of attaining Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah performance in these banks. This research extends the previous literature on evaluating the performance of IBs beyond the financial return, which includes their ethical and social identity based on the Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah scale, especially the post-GFC period. The result also reveals that there is a financial cost to achieving the Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah, as IBs that achieved high MSI scores have sacrificed financially. This supports the findings of the literature that IBs prefer financial returns over their ethical and social impact.
Suggested Citation
Salah Alhammadi & Khaled O. Alotaibi & Dzikri F. Hakam, 2022.
"Analysing Islamic banking ethical performance from Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah perspective: evidence from Indonesia,"
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 1171-1193, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:1171-1193
DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1848179
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jsustf:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:1171-1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSFI20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.