IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v7y2004i2p213-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pollution concerns in context: a comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Burningham
  • Diana Thrush

Abstract

This paper examines accounts of the risks associated with living close to potential sources of pollution emphasizing the way in which discussion of the risk of pollution is informed by wider assessments of local life. In particular it highlights ways in which residents' accounts of local pollution often diverge from the way in which the problem is conceptualized by ‘outsiders’. Data are analysed from focus groups with lone mothers in two neighbourhoods facing clear local pollution problems -- in one case from a factory and in the other from major roads. Detailed discussion is provided of how the issue of pollution fits into lone mothers' wider assessments of life within these neighbourhoods. The correlation between poor populations and pollution has recently been described by environmental groups such as Friends of the Earth as a problem of environmental injustice. The analysis suggests, however, that this description often has little resonance with those affected by local pollution and, as a consequence, may not provide the most profitable way of linking the environmental and social exclusion agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Burningham & Diana Thrush, 2004. "Pollution concerns in context: a comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 213-232, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:213-232
    DOI: 10.1080/1366987042000158721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1366987042000158721
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1366987042000158721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paloma Vicens & Luis Heredia & Edgar Bustamante & Yolanda Pérez & José L Domingo & Margarita Torrente, 2021. "Does living close to a petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of the COVID-19 lockdown?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Wouter Poortinga & Patrick Cox & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2008. "The Perceived Health Risks of Indoor Radon Gas and Overhead Powerlines: A Comparative Multilevel Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 235-248, February.
    3. Anneleen Kenis & Maarten Loopmans, 2022. "Just air? Spatial injustice and the politicisation of air pollution," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(3), pages 563-571, May.
    4. Marciano, James A. & Lilieholm, Robert J. & Teisl, Mario F. & Leahy, Jessica E. & Neupane, Binod, 2014. "Factors affecting public support for forest-based biorefineries: A comparison of mill towns and the general public in Maine, USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 301-311.
    5. Wang, Yu & Gu, Jibao & Wu, Jianlin, 2020. "Explaining local residents’ acceptance of rebuilding nuclear power plants: The roles of perceived general benefit and perceived local benefit," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Aldred, Rachel & Tepe, Daniela, 2011. "Framing scrappage in Germany and the UK: from climate discourse to recession talk?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1563-1569.
    7. Miguel Ángel López‐Navarro & Vicente Tortosa‐Edo & Jaume Llorens‐Monzonís, 2015. "Environmental Management Systems and Local Community Perceptions: the Case of Petrochemical Complexes Located in Ports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 236-251, May.
    8. van der Horst, Dan, 2007. "NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2705-2714, May.
    9. Miguel Ángel López-Navarro & Jaume Llorens-Monzonís & Vicente Tortosa-Edo, 2013. "The Effect of Social Trust on Citizens’ Health Risk Perception in the Context of a Petrochemical Industrial Complex," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Dan Venables & Nick Pidgeon & Peter Simmons & Karen Henwood & Karen Parkhill, 2009. "Living with Nuclear Power: A Q‐Method Study of Local Community Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(8), pages 1089-1104, August.
    11. Piyapong Janmaimool & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2014. "Evaluating Determinants of Environmental Risk Perception for Risk Management in Contaminated Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:213-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.