IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v6y2003i2p113-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of Expected Value illustrated in decision-making under risk: single-play vs multiple-play

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Li

Abstract

The present research on risky decision making extends the exploration of the singleplay/multiple-play distinction. Mathematics students are asked to respond to two choice problems, each having three decision tasks: choosing between multiple-play gambles, choosing between single-play gambles and matching paired possible outcomes. It is shown that the generalized model of Expected Utility (EU) theory appears to be redundant for the multiple-play situation, given that the simpler Expected Value (EV) theory correctly predicts the observed behaviour, and in the single-play situation it appears to be predictively inadequate. The observed choices in single-play situations could be better accounted for by the equate-to-differentiate approach revealed by the matching data. The overall results suggest that the long-run and short-run perspectives are in fact so utterly different that the short-run one is perhaps not based on any kind of expectation rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Li, 2003. "The role of Expected Value illustrated in decision-making under risk: single-play vs multiple-play," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 113-124, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:6:y:2003:i:2:p:113-124
    DOI: 10.1080/1366987032000078893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1366987032000078893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1366987032000078893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arpan Jani, 2021. "An agent-based model of repeated decision making under risk: modeling the role of alternate reference points and risk behavior on long-run outcomes," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1271-1297, November.
    2. Michael L. DeKay & Dan R. Schley & Seth A. Miller & Breann M. Erford & Jonghun Sun & Michael N. Karim & Mandy B. Lanyon, 2016. "The persistence of common-ratio effects in multiple-play decisions," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 361-379, July.
    3. Michael L. DeKay, 2011. "Are Medical Outcomes Fungible? A Survey of Voters, Medical Administrators, and Physicians," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(2), pages 338-353, March.
    4. Gary Colbert & Dennis Murray & Robert Nieschwietz, 2009. "The use of expected value in pricing judgments," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 199-208, March.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:361-379 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Müller, Martin & Olsen, Jerome & Kirchler, Erich & Kogler, Christoph, 2023. "How explicit expected value information affects tax compliance decisions and information acquisition," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:134-145 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Michael L. DeKay & John C. Hershey & Mark D. Spranca, & Peter A. Ubel & David A. Asch, 2006. "Are medical treatments for individuals and groups like single-play and multiple-play gambles?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 134-145, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:6:y:2003:i:2:p:113-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.