IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v4y2001i4p353-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of PCE use by dry cleaners and dry cleaning customers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel C. Kovacs
  • Baruch Fischhoff
  • Mitchell J. Small

Abstract

Recent studies by consumer and environmental groups have raised questions about Perchloroethylene (PCE) used by over 85% of the commercial dry cleaners in the United States, but classified as a possible or probable carcinogen. Many environmentalists favour replacing PCE dry cleaning with alternative, chlorine-free processes currently under development. However, even if these alternatives eventually provide adequate replacements, some time will be needed to convert technologies in an industry that is dominated by small, family-run businesses. This study examines the possibility of reducing PCE exposure with existing technology, through provision of information aimed at changing dry cleaner and customer behaviour. Dry cleaning customers and dry cleaning store owners and operators were interviewed to identify their mental models of how PCE risks are created and controlled. The interviews with dry cleaning customers revealed little awareness of concerns about PCE. Because few understood the actual dry cleaning process, customers had difficulty understanding the nature of the concern and methods of protecting themselves (other than dry cleaning their clothes less frequently). They did seem to understand, though, that dry cleaning is a chemical process and that some concerns probably exist. The interviews with dry cleaners revealed a much greater level of awareness of concerns and a wide range of related opinions. Most deny that such concerns should be given credence. However, their justifications often rely on anecdotal evidence and incomplete or incorrect assumptions. Most did acknowledge that more advanced technology, economic incentives, and current regulations provide appropriate opportunity and motivation for responsible business practices that minimize or reduce exposure. A communication strategy is derived from these results, relying on dry cleaner and dry cleaning customer education.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel C. Kovacs & Baruch Fischhoff & Mitchell J. Small, 2001. "Perceptions of PCE use by dry cleaners and dry cleaning customers," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 353-375, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:4:y:2001:i:4:p:353-375
    DOI: 10.1080/1366987010062749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1366987010062749
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1366987010062749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Cox & Jörg Niewöhner & Nick Pidgeon & Simon Gerrard & Baruch Fischhoff & Donna Riley, 2003. "The Use of Mental Models in Chemical Risk Protection: Developing a Generic Workplace Methodology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 311-324, April.
    2. Catherine E. LePrevost & Margaret R. Blanchard & W. Gregory Cope, 2011. "The Pesticide Risk Beliefs Inventory: A Quantitative Instrument for the Assessment of Beliefs about Pesticide Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Melissa Zaksek & Joseph L. Arvai, 2004. "Toward Improved Communication about Wildland Fire: Mental Models Research to Identify Information Needs for Natural Resource Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1503-1514, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:4:y:2001:i:4:p:353-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.