IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v3y2000i3p237-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spain: commercialization drives public debate and precaution

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Todt
  • José Luis Luj

Abstract

Since the commercialization of genetically modified (GM) crops and foods in Spain in 1996, these products have become a topic of public concern and conflict. Several important social protagonists from science, industry and civil society have become involved in the public debate. The conflicts have influenced the regulation, improving its precautionary content, in response to social pressures in Spain and elsewhere in Europe. As Spain has become the primary cultivator of GM crops in the European Union, commercial cultivation there has been scientifically monitored for possible long-term environmental effects. Regulators have also asked industry to cease using antibiotic-resistant marker genes (ARMs). The expert advisory body of the regulatory process, composed exclusively of scientific experts and members of the public administration, has become a de facto policy maker. This body takes an ambiguous precautionary stand in decisions about authorizing field trials as well as products. It recommends more studies on the environmental effects of GM crops, without necessarily claiming that these studies would be essential for decision making on authorizations. Thus the meaning of precaution is being established through regulatory practice, whereby the expert body shows sensitivity to the public debate and to NGO pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Todt & José Luis Luj, 2000. "Spain: commercialization drives public debate and precaution," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 237-245, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:3:y:2000:i:3:p:237-245
    DOI: 10.1080/13669870050043107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669870050043107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669870050043107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:3:y:2000:i:3:p:237-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.